Ambitious clean energy targets have intensified debates over state-level mandates and local control over land use, highlighted by a recent spate of legislative setbacks for utility-scale solar siting and permitting processes. As shifting regulatory frameworks continue to create hurdles for utility-scale solar developers, addressing community buy-in remains a top priority for project approval.

Below, we examine recent legislative and judicial developments in key states, their implications for utility-scale solar deployment, and how to mitigate these challenges using TrinaPro total solar solutions and Trinasolar’s high-efficiency Vertex modules, assembled in Texas.

State-Specific Solar Permitting Challenges and Regulatory Shifts

Virginia

A legislative effort in Virginia aimed at streamlining solar siting processes suffered defeat despite bipartisan support from agricultural and environmental coalitions. The proposed bill would have required localities to adopt state-developed guidelines that limit overly restrictive solar ordinances to address concerns that county-level delays could jeopardize compliance with the Virginia Clean Economy Act’s (VCEA) broader decarbonization goals. The opposition mainly centered on fears of eroding local land-use authority, particularly in rural regions, where preserving farmland remains a cultural priority.

Michigan

Meanwhile, Michigan’s approach to countering local opposition through state-level permitting authority has sparked significant legal challenges. Similar to Virginia’s proposal, Michigan Public Act 233, enacted in late 2023, allows developers to bypass local governments by petitioning the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) for projects exceeding 50 MW. However, more than 70 local governments have contested the law, arguing it undermines longstanding traditions of local governance. Proponents emphasized that prior to the law, nearly 40% of proposed solar projects faced rejection at the county level, stalling progress toward climate goals. 

Ohio

In Ohio, a high-profile judicial case may redefine the weight given to local opposition in state permitting decisions. A proposed solar project denied approval despite meeting all technical requirements is now the subject of a legal battle over whether unanimous municipal objections should override statutory criteria. During recent hearings, state justices scrutinized the legal basis for prioritizing local dissent over project merits, with implications for how other states interpret similar conflicts. The outcome could affect permitting timelines and investor confidence in regions where preemptive county-level restrictions have become widespread.

Indiana

Indiana’s 2025 legislative session did not approve House Bill 1628, which proposed transferring authority over multi-county energy projects from municipalities to the state. Opponents, including the Indiana County Commissioners Association, successfully framed the bill as an assault on home rule principles by arguing it would strip communities of input on projects spanning carbon capture, nuclear facilities, and transmission lines. The failure leaves a patchwork of local moratoriums intact, with 22 counties implementing solar restrictions since 2020. However, Senate Bill 425, a narrower proposal excluding wind and solar from state siting oversight, remains active, signaling continued interest in streamlining the state’s energy infrastructure approval process.

These legislative defeats and the ongoing litigation highlight the delicate balance between centralized planning and decentralized decision-making taking place across multiple jurisdictions.

Impacts on Solar Development Pipelines

The regulatory volatility creates three primary challenges for developers:

1. Extended Timelines: The average solar proposal requires 18-24 months for approval, often necessitating repeated redesigns to accommodate shifting local requirements, as projects languish in review for years.

2. Escalating Costs: Developers are facing increasing legal fees for contesting cases and soft costs for redundant environmental studies demanded by multiple jurisdictions.

3. Investor Uncertainty: The failed siting reforms have led developers to pause billions of dollars in planned investments, with some even withdrawing proposals due to potential litigation risks.

One way to avoid the risks posed by community opposition involves embracing evidence-based strategies that promote biodiversity, equitable land use, and shared local values. 

Community Engagement Strategies Grounded in Ecovoltaic Evidence

Instead of evaluating a project’s merits, some state boards are denying permits using the mere existence of local opposition, which often stems from misinformation about environmental impacts. Rural communities with historical ties to agriculture may view solar projects as a threat to cultural identity or economic stability, particularly when developers fail to contextualize projects within local values. Even the broadest public support for renewables can fracture at the local level when projects conflict with community standards for acceptable development.

It’s no secret that ecological co-benefits represent a powerful tool for building community support, since solar projects can serve as dual-purpose land-use systems that replenish and enhance the environment. Indeed, developers said that amending plans for vegetative screening was the most common change made in response to community feedback.

New research bolsters the ecological benefits, which should help build community support. In the longest-running and most comprehensive assessment of its kind, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s (NREL) Innovative Solar Practices Integrated with Rural Economies and Ecosystems (InSPIRE) team conducted research and gathered six years’ worth of data on the interactions between habitat, pollinators, soil, and solar energy production at three utility-scale solar projects in Minnesota.

The findings showed that colocating native prairie vegetation with utility-scale solar installations, a practice known as ecovoltaics, supports pollinator populations, improves soil health, and helps restore degraded agricultural land. 

Installations paired with pollinator habitats increased crop yields in adjacent fields.

In regions facing agricultural decline, ecovoltaics improved soil rehabilitation with more matter content under solar arrays.

Developers can counter misperceptions of environmental harm by collaborating with ecological experts to design site-specific planting schemes that position projects as contributors to regional biodiversity goals. 

The Role of High-Efficiency Solar Modules in Mitigation Strategies

High-efficiency Vertex PV modules address both technical and community concerns. By generating more energy per acre, a system using Vertex modules requires fewer panels to meet capacity targets and provides critical advantages in regions with dense populations or ecologically sensitive areas. Compared to conventional panels, this means lower land-use requirements, which minimizes habitat disruption and the visual footprint while aligning with local preferences for less intrusive installations.

Vertex modules can also lower soft costs associated with construction, such as reduced wiring, racking, and labor expenses, which improves project economics while accelerating deployment timelines. This efficiency gain proves particularly valuable in states with contested land-use policies, where smaller physical footprints may ease regulatory approvals and community acceptance.

Developers partnering with TrinaPro total solar solutions for bundled modules, inverters, and other balance-of-system (BOS) components overcome two critical challenges: supply chain delays and performance mismatches. Ensuring component compatibility avoids the energy losses typically caused by voltage and current mismatches in piecemeal systems, resulting in predictable project timelines that alleviate community concerns about prolonged construction phases.

Co-locating native habitat restoration with utility-scale solar installations using high-efficiency Vertex modules helps developers address the tripartite challenges of climate mitigation, biodiversity loss, and community acceptance. Key to this approach will be positioning projects as multifunctional landscapes that actively contribute to the ecosystem. As regulatory environments evolve to favor renewable energy, projects that demonstrably enhance, rather than merely minimize harm to, their host communities will be crucial in overcoming local opposition.

Click here to learn more about Vertex modules and TrinaPro total solar solutions.

Follow Us on Social Media: Stay updated on the latest news, events, and insights from Trinasolar US by following us on LinkedIn, YouTube, Twitter/X, Facebook, and Instagram. We regularly share insights and educational information on product updates, industry trends, and strategies to help you succeed.

Looking for Trinasolar Modules? Click here to find a list of PV module suppliers and distributors.

Want to learn more? Reach out to explore how we can help.